AI generates. You decide.
Upload disclosure → shape key decisions → review instead of rewrite. Start with a structured draft, not a blank page.
Every claim element needs support — Synkti keeps the spec aligned as claims evolve.
Demo = sample data only. Real workflows happen in an NDA workspace.
Use sample disclosures in the demo. Real disclosures → NDA workspace.
Design partners test against these benchmarks on real workflows. You see the numbers as we iterate together.
No new tools to learn. No deployment to manage. Your associates focus on legal strategy, not blank pages.
Inventor disclosures, prior art references, technical documents. Drop them into the interface.
The pipeline identifies critical decision points — claim scope, dependent claim strategy, specification depth — and asks your attorney for input before proceeding. Not one-shot generation.
Because your attorney shaped the draft at every decision point, the first draft matches their intent. Review and refine, not delete and start over.
First draft in your document format, ready for your DMS and filing workflow.
When claims change, the spec updates with them — so you're not manually chasing support.
Every option on the market asks you to compromise on something fundamental.
Third-party SaaS tools require your data. They need access to your confidential work to be useful. That's a privilege and compliance problem your ethics committee won't sign off on.
Even "enterprise" API plans route your patent specifications through third-party servers. That means your patent specifications route through infrastructure you don't control.
GPUs, MLOps, scaling, failover, model evaluation, and RAG pipelines. That's a full engineering team. It's not your core competency.
One-shot generation ignores your firm's claim construction conventions, prosecution history, and writing style. You end up rewriting instead of reviewing.
Your work continues as usual. No downtime. No surprises. No emergencies. No vendor lock-ins.
Your data travels encrypted to an isolated environment, not shared with other clients. Need more control? BYOC and sovereign deployment options available for firms that require it.
Full request logging. Clear data boundaries. When regulators or clients ask where their data went, there's a clear answer: encrypted, isolated, never shared.
Production-grade system with monitoring. Attorneys rely on it. Email for updates, custom-tailored features, and ongoing optimizations.
No surprise cloud bills. Usage-based pricing that scales predictably. Runs on your account with resource limits you set. You see every line item.
Design partners shape the tool before firm-wide deployment. Demo it, test it on real work, then deploy when you're ready.
See the pipeline in action on sample patent disclosures. Watch deployment happen live in a test environment. Ask hard questions.
Design Partner practitioners are the first running Synkti inside real drafting workflows. You test it on actual work, show where it fits — or breaks — and your feedback directly shapes how the system evolves. Limited slots so iteration stays fast and collaborative.
E2E encrypted managed deployment is the default: fast setup, fully isolated, no infra headaches. BYOC or sovereign options available for firms that require their own cloud.
Every workflow we build addresses the problems your attorneys actually face, not generic "AI for legal" features.
Inconsistent claim language across associates and drafts
Prosecution history estoppel risks from poorly constructed specifications
Prior art integration that misses relevant references or over-cites
Office action response cycles extending prosecution timelines
New associates producing drafts that require extensive partner revision
Scaling patent volume without proportional headcount increases
At 20 applications per month, that's 200–280 hours redirected from drafting to prosecution strategy and client work. Your attorneys spend their time on legal judgment, not blank pages.
Have a real disclosure? We'll set up a private NDA workspace and run it together. You get the generated specification in 24 hours. No integration, no commitment. You evaluate the output on your own terms.
Design Partners test the pipeline on real workflows and directly shape what gets built. You get iteration speed. We get honest feedback.
Limited to 2–3 partners to maintain direct responsiveness to feedback within hours, not days.
The full workflow — generation plus attorney decisions at key stages plus final review — takes 1–2 hours versus 12–16 hours today. Your attorney stays in control throughout. We measure the actual time savings as you test it on real workflows.
Only authorized members of your organization. Data is processed inside a controlled, isolated environment with encryption in transit and clear access boundaries. API communication is encrypted, and audit logs provide traceability for compliance and review.
The pipeline uses multiple models for different stages. Smaller models handle extraction and structuring. Frontier models handle first-draft generation. Model selection depends on your accuracy and cost requirements.
N-stage pipeline with validation gates. Each stage has a single responsibility with structured output verification before the next stage begins. Hallucination is a pipeline problem, not a model problem. We solve it with architecture.
Batch mode is designed for preliminary analysis — things like document extraction, prior art mapping, or assumption-driven reviews across large portfolios. Attorneys define the analysis goals upfront, and outputs are returned with assumptions clearly surfaced for review. Drafting and strategy decisions remain interactive, so attorneys stay actively involved wherever legal judgment matters.
Harvey and similar tools operate as third-party black boxes, where privilege protection relies primarily on contracts. Synkti runs in an isolated, controlled environment with full encryption in transit, and processing happens inside a dedicated workspace rather than shared systems. Audit logs provide clear traceability for compliance and internal review. The result is a workflow that feels effectively air-gapped in practice, where trust comes from architecture rather than policy alone.